Warhammer 40K: Fixing T’au Markerlights in 9th
Let’s talk about how the Markerlight system itself could change for the new edition.
I’ve discussed the problems with the Markerlight system, focussing on the challenge of getting five Markerlights on a target and the different options that T’au Empire players have when it comes to this issue. Today we talk solutions.
Where We Are Now
To begin, let’s take a look at the Markerlight system as it currently works. T’au players fire Markerlights at enemy units in order to gain benefits for other T’au units when they shoot at the same target. There are five benefits, and they are cumulative. The benefits are as follows:
- One Markerlight on an enemy target allows all other T’au units firing at that target to re-roll hit rolls of 1.
- Two hits allow Seeker Missiles to be fired at the model’s Ballistic Skill (otherwise Seekers would hit on 6s).
- Three hits allow the firing unit to ignore the target’s cover.
- Four hits allow the firing unit to move and shoot Heavy without penalty and advance and fire Assault weapons without penalty.
- Five hits allow the firing unit to add 1 to hit rolls.
There are some great effects here, and there are some that are somewhat negligible. Re-rolling 1s to hit and adding 1 to hit rolls are both excellent bonuses, and these bonuses make T’au units far more accurate than they otherwise would be.
However, as I said last week, it’s not always so easy to get those five hits on a target. I think that the system should change in order for fewer hits to grant more benefits, but we’ll come to that in a moment.
Three Markerlights allows T’au units to ignore cover, which is another solid bonus — there is a lot of cover out there in 9th edition — but it’s the two-Markerlight and four-Markerlight bonuses where we see less utility.
The Seeker Missile effect is fine — but only if the T’au player is taking Seekers. At the moment, most T’au lists contain few if any Seeker Missiles. The Skyray isn’t particularly popular at the moment, and we tend not to see Seekers attached to Piranhas because they tend to be destroyed quite early on. Broadsides can take a Seeker each, which isn’t such a bad idea, but, generally speaking, T’au players Seldom take Seekers.
The bonuses to moving and shooting that four hits grants are, again, fine, but T’au players rarely need to take advantage of it. The big boys — Riptides, Ghostkeels, Broadsides — can move and shoot their Heavy weapons without penalty and the smaller chaps — Crisis Suits, Stealth Suits — can’t take Heavy weapons and seldom need to advance and shoot Assault weapons. Of course, it’s a nice bonus to have, but I think that the opportunity cost is too great. It should be replaced with something more appropriate to 9th edition.
Markerlight Solutions
With that in mind, what would a Markerlight system fit for 9th edition look like? Let’s get into some ideas.
A Smaller Table
If we’re going to stick with a table of cumulative bonuses — which we certainly wouldn’t have to — how could we make it more effective and less troublesome to get the best effects? Here’s one idea: make the Markerlight table itself smaller. What would this look like in practice? I think we could have a Markerlight table that works much the same as it does now, but that only grants three bonuses.
This way, we could keep the models that take Markerlights broadly the same — again, these models need an update, but let’s just presume for a moment that they stay mostly the same — and take advantage of better effects with fewer Markerlight hits.
How about this:
- One Markerlight hit allows all other T’au Empire units to re-rolls 1s to hit when shooting at this target.
- Two Markerlight hits allow all other T’au Empire units to ignore all negative hit modifiers when shooting at this target.
- Three Markerlight hits allow all other T’au Empire units to add 1 to hit rolls when shooting at this target.
This system would make Markerlights a completely different beast to the way they are played now. The way Seeker Missiles work would have to change, of course, but that would be a small trade-off for such a powerful system.
How would this system affect the faction? Put simply, it would solve the issue of average Ballistic Skill. Indeed, T’au Battlesuits wouldn’t need to have a Ballistic Skill of 3 if this were the Markerlight system. This would be the case because it would be so much easier to get that magical +1 to hit rolls with this system. With our current stratagems, we could get three Markerlight hits with one Markerlight hit and two stratagems, Aerial Targeting and Uplinked Markerlight
Of course, this would necessitate that these stratagems aren’t removed from the next T’au codex and that they don’t change for the worse, but we can only speculate on what will happen with our stratagems, so let’s just presume that they don’t change for the purposes of this exercise.
Now we have a reliable way of getting our key assets to hit their targets in the shooting phase. This one change would, I think, significantly improve the performance of the faction. It wouldn’t be a panacea, but it would go a hell of a long way.
Ignoring negative hit modifiers should be a part of the next Markerlight system, whatever it looks like, because the T’au need to be able to rely on the shooting phase to get their business done, and even one negative hit penalty can throw a spanner in the works for the T’au player.
This is essential because, at the moment at least, the T’au have no other way of dealing damage. We have no play in the Psychic phase. We have very little play in the Fight phase. If we have a bad Shooting phase, the wheels can very quickly come off. Whether this is in the form of a new Markerlight system or a new stratagem or something else entirely, I would argue that T’au players should have a way to ignore negative hit modifiers on at least one target.
One-off Bonuses
The above Markerlight scenario, then, would be a simple, easy fix that would solve some of the faction’s key problems. But what other ideas could we bring to the table? Could Markerlights grant one-off bonuses in addition to or instead of the bonuses from the Markerlight table? For example:
- For the cost of one Markerlight hit and in place of all the effects of the above table, one T’au Empire unit may make an additional shot with all Rapid Fire weapons at -1 AP when shooting at this target.
I think that this kind of effect might have some play. Of course, we could change the type of weapon that it affects, the number of shots it adds, and the modifier to the AP, but the fundamental idea remains the same: in place of increased accuracy, take more, higher-quality shots on the unit’s weapons. I can’t imagine that it would be as popular as the Markerlight table that I discussed above, but it would be an interesting alternative in certain contexts.
This would, for example, be a great option for danger-close Fire Warriors supported by a Cadre Fireblade: four Pulse Rifle shots each at -1 AP would be a tempting choice for many T’au players.
Let’s continue down the path of one-and-done bonuses. Here’s another idea:
- For the cost of one Markerlight hit and in place of all the effects of the above table, one T’au Empire unit may re-roll wound rolls of 1 when shooting at this target.
Again, such an ability wouldn’t be as popular as the accuracy that the table above grants, but it would be another interesting alternative. Indeed, if fewer Markerlight hits are available, T’au players may prefer to re-roll wound rolls of 1 for one unit than re-rolling hit rolls of 1 for all units that shoot at the target in question.
Let’s check out one more for good measure:
- For the cost of one Markerlight hit and in place of all the effects of the above table, one T’au Empire XV25 Stealth Suits unit may shoot twice this phase. However, all of the XV25 Stealth Suits’ shooting attacks must target this unit.
Again, we could apply such an ability to a variety of T’au units — Crisis Suits, Fire Warriors, probably not Riptides — and we would have another interesting alternative to the above table. Stealth Suits shooting twice for the cost of a Markerlight would certainly be good, but it wouldn’t be too strong. Of course, the Stealth Suits will probably change with the next codex, so we’ll have to see how viable an ability like this would be.
As a side note, I think that the T’au really should have a double-shoot ability. At the moment, we have one that is Sept-locked, applying only to Vior’la infantry. As I’ve mentioned a few times, the Vior’la Sept doesn’t really get a look-in in competitive T’au lists, only T’au Sept and the Enclaves do, meaning that at the moment double-shooting T’au infantry are rarely seen.
Decisions, Decisions
There are many different directions that the designers could take with the Markerlight system. Something similar to that which I describe in this article would be an excellent update for 9th edition, but that doesn’t mean that there aren’t plenty more interesting ways to take the system.
Moreover, the new Markerlight system needs to fit in with the new codex as a whole. If the T’au Empire becomes a mostly Ballistic Skill 3 army, there is significantly less need for a Markerlight table similar to the one I discuss above. Indeed, something like that would probably be too good: Riptides and Broadsides hitting on 2s and re-rolling 1s at such a slight cost isn’t a good direction to take the faction.
But I’m very much open to the T’au remaining at Ballistic Skill 4 — if the new Markerlight system makes our units more accurate at a relatively low cost. The army should be able to shoot straight, and whether we get there through Markerlights or through a stat-line is immaterial.
There’s plenty of scope for an interesting Markerlight system that is unique to the faction, providing engaging gameplay opportunities within the scope of a new, updated army. Let’s hope that the designers knock this one out of the park. I’m confident that they will.
What do you think of these solutions?
And remember, Frontline Gaming sells gaming products at a discount, every day in their webcart!
